How Much Buying Power Do Options Use? Margin for Sellers

June 5, 2026 · by Theo Chen

Key takeaways

  • A Cash-Secured Put reserves the full strike x 100; a Covered Call uses the 100 shares you own - that cash or stock is your buying-power reduction.
  • Sold on margin, a naked Put reserves far less - a common Reg-T figure is the premium plus the greater of 20% of the stock minus the out-of-the-money amount, or 10% of the strike.
  • Defined-risk spreads reserve only width minus credit, freeing the most buying power - and they cap the loss.
  • Portfolio-margin and SPAN accounts can require less still. Lower buying power is leverage, not safety - size by the loss, not the margin.

The honest answer is that it depends on two things: the structure you sell, and the account you sell it in. A Cash-Secured Put reserves the full strike price x 100. The same Put sold naked on a margin account reserves a fraction of that. A defined-risk spread reserves least of all. And a portfolio-margin or SPAN account can cut the number again. Same trade, very different capital. Here is each one, with one real example priced every way.

What “buying power” actually means#

Buying power is the cash your broker lets you put to work. Buying-power reduction (BPR) is how much a single trade ties up while it is open. For an option Seller, BPR is the collateral the broker holds in case the trade goes against you - it is not what you paid, and it is often not your maximum loss. Read it wrong and you over-leverage without noticing; read it right and you can size positions properly.

A Cash-Secured Put: the full amount#

A Cash-Secured Put is “secured” because you set aside the entire cash to buy the shares if you are assigned:

Buying power = strike price x 100 (per contract)

Sell one $295-strike Put and the broker holds $29,500. You collect the premium up front, so your real outlay is a little less, but the full amount is reserved against assignment. This is the most conservative way to sell a Put, and the figure the Cash-Secured Put Calculator shows as “cash secured / margin required.”

A naked Put on margin: a fraction of that#

Sell the same Put without setting the cash aside - a naked Put in a margin account - and the requirement drops sharply. A common Reg-T formula, per share, is:

premium + the greater of: (20% of the stock price - the out-of-the-money amount) or (10% of the strike)

On a $310 stock with that $295 Put, that is the greater of (20% x 310 - 15) = 47 or (10% x 295) = 29.50, so about $47 x 100 = $4,700 of buying power instead of $29,500. The catch: the dollar risk is identical. If the stock collapses you lose the same money - you have just put up one-sixth the collateral, which is leverage. And if the Put is assigned you still have to take the shares, which on margin becomes a roughly 50% requirement or a margin loan, so a small naked position can balloon fast. Brokers also add minimums and charge more on volatile or earnings-week names, so treat the formula as a guide, not a quote.

A Covered Call: the shares are the collateral#

A Covered Call sells one Call against 100 shares you already own, so the shares themselves are the collateral and the short Call adds no extra margin - it is covered. The buying power tied up is just the cost of those shares (or their margin requirement if you hold them on margin). By put-call parity a Covered Call and a Cash-Secured Put at the same strike have the same payoff, which is why they need about the same capital. The Covered Call Calculator models the income and the capped upside.

Defined-risk spreads: the least buying power#

This is where the requirement falls off a cliff. A credit spread - say a Bull Put Spread - buys a protective long Put below the one you sell, so the broker reserves only the worst case:

Buying power = (strike width - net credit) x 100 (per contract)

Sell the $295 Put and buy the $290 Put for a $1.50 net credit and the most you can lose - and the most that is reserved - is (5 - 1.50) x 100 = $350. The same bullish-income view that tied up $29,500 as a Cash-Secured Put now uses a few hundred dollars and caps the loss. The Bull Put Spread Calculator returns the exact buying power at risk. You give up a larger premium for a hard floor under the loss.

The same trade, priced every way#

One contract, bullish on a $310 stock, sold at the $295 strike:

  • Cash-Secured Put: about $29,500 of buying power.
  • Naked Put (Reg-T margin): about $4,700.
  • Bull Put Spread ($295 / $290): about $350.

The cash-secured and naked Puts carry the same downside - only the collateral differs. The spread is the one that actually changes the risk, because the long Put caps it.

Why your broker’s number is different#

The formulas above are the standard Reg-T rules, and your platform will rarely match them to the dollar. Brokers add house minimums, raise requirements on volatile names and through earnings, and treat each account type differently:

  • Cash account: you must fully secure the trade - the cash-secured figure.
  • Reg-T margin: the rule-based formulas above, naked positions allowed.
  • Portfolio margin: risk-based - it stress-tests your whole book and can require much less on hedged positions (and more on concentrated ones).
  • SPAN: the risk-based system for futures and options on futures, again often lower for offsetting positions.

Always read the buying-power reduction your platform shows on the order ticket before you commit - that, not a formula, is what your account will actually hold.

Buying power is not risk#

This is the one to internalise. The naked Put above uses roughly one-sixth the buying power of the cash-secured version, but it loses the same dollars if the stock falls to zero. Low margin makes return-on-capital look spectacular precisely because the denominator shrank - the risk did not. Size every position by the loss it can hand you, not by the buying power it frees up. The Kelly Criterion Position Sizing tool turns your edge and account size into a sensible position, and the position-sizing guide covers the rule of thumb most sellers actually use.

How to free up buying power#

If you are capital-constrained, the honest lever is structure, not leverage:

  • Trade defined-risk spreads instead of naked or cash-secured Puts - the single biggest reduction, and it caps the loss too.
  • Use a lower-priced underlying so each contract reserves less.
  • Close or roll positions that have done their work rather than letting them tie up collateral to the last day.

What you should not do is free up buying power by going naked and then sizing as if the risk shrank with the margin. It did not. The cheapest honest way to sell premium with a small account is a defined-risk spread; the cash-secured route asks for far more capital but hands you a larger premium and, if assigned, a stock you were willing to own. For the full picture on starting capital, see how much money you need to sell options.

Frequently asked questions

How much buying power does a cash-secured put use?

The full strike price x 100 per contract. A $295-strike put ties up $29,500, set aside so you can buy the 100 shares if you are assigned. You keep the premium, so your net outlay is slightly less, but the broker holds the whole amount.

How much margin does a naked put require?

Far less than the cash-secured amount. A common Reg-T formula is the premium plus the greater of (20% of the stock price minus how far the put is out of the money) or (10% of the strike), times 100. On a $310 stock with a $295 put that is roughly $4,700 versus $29,500 cash-secured - but the dollar risk is identical, and your broker's exact number varies.

Does a covered call use buying power?

The 100 shares are the collateral, so the short call itself adds no extra margin - it is covered. The buying power tied up is simply the cost of the shares (or their margin requirement if you hold them on margin). That is why a covered call and a cash-secured put at the same strike need about the same capital.

Why is my broker's margin requirement different from the formula?

Because the formula is the standard Reg-T rule, and brokers layer on house minimums, higher rates for volatile or earnings-week names, and different account types. A portfolio-margin account prices risk across your whole book and can require much less on hedged positions; a SPAN account (futures and options on futures) is risk-based too. Always read the buying-power reduction your platform shows before you place the order.

Does lower margin mean lower risk?

No - and this is the trap. A naked put uses a fraction of the cash a cash-secured put does, but if the stock goes to zero you lose the same dollars. Lower margin is leverage, not safety. Size every trade by the loss it can hand you, not by the buying power it ties up.

Related questions

Share:

Educational content only. Nothing here is financial advice. Options trading carries the risk of significant loss — understand assignment and size positions accordingly before you trade.